CRA’s big funding increases could be better spent elsewhere

Article content material

I’m not one to frequently bash the Canada Revenue Agency. It has an important job to do which is to manage the nation’s very advanced taxation legal guidelines and people of most provinces and territories. If a rustic has earnings tax legal guidelines, it had higher correctly administer them.

In all my years of coping with the CRA, I’ve had largely good experiences. There are some superb and devoted public servants who take delight within the job they do and usually do it nicely. Don’t get me mistaken, I’ve had my justifiable share of head-scratching moments as nicely, or days while you surprise how the particular person you’re coping with bought the job within the first place. However, once more, my experiences have typically been good.

Article content material

Article content material

In most of the latest federal budgets, there have been important quantities of cash added to the CRA’s finances. In a few of the latest budgets, the additions have been beneath the guise of going after “offshore tax evasion” (a long-time bogeyman phrase that has extra fiction to it than truth).

The CRA’s headcount has additionally been rising. It had 39,484 staff in 2016, however that has grown to 59,019 as of 2023 (final up to date in June 2023). That could be a 49.5 per cent progress price within the span of eight years.

Canada’s inhabitants has been rising as nicely (particularly not too long ago), however the CRA’s tempo of employment progress is definitely outpacing that progress. In a few of the latest years, the CRA’s headcount improve was as a result of administration of COVID-19 help applications, however the trajectory was on a steep incline even earlier than such calls for.

The CRA has lengthy been one of many nation’s largest employers. Accordingly, I don’t suppose it’s unreasonable to ask whether or not or not Canada is getting good worth for its giant annual outlay in wage and different prices. An annual learn of the CRA’s Departmental Results Report is at all times attention-grabbing to see the way it evaluates itself.

Article content material

Article content material

The view from the “low-cost seats” (which means taxpayers and their advisers) at all times has the next common feedback in regards to the worth supplied by the CRA: cellphone name wait instances are horrifically lengthy; or you’ll be able to’t get by way of in any respect; the know-how is archaic and irritating (however to be truthful, one can perceive that safety of data is important so the CRA should at all times prioritize safety forward of comfort); and auditors or different frontline staff are inexperienced and never useful.

The above record is usually truthful and definitely constant suggestions. Lately, although, the above complaints, in my expertise, have been magnified much more. It’s fairly apparent {that a} good chunk of the CRA’s staff are nonetheless “working from house.” Whereas CRA staff could discover that extra handy, it’s uncertain that it provides to total productiveness, good coaching and a greater “shopper expertise.”

Lately, there have been no scarcity of horrible cellphone connections that usually drop when conversing with a CRA worker, spotty Microsoft Groups conferences with the CRA’s pretend digital background, blanket/voluminous requests despatched to taxpayers which can be out of contact, unacceptable turnaround instances to resolve even routine issues and brokers who’re so clearly undertrained.

Article content material

The CRA has traditionally competed for expertise with the skilled group. Typically, the skilled group will pay extra, however the CRA can typically provide extra time without work and higher long-term pensions. Does this affect the general high quality of the candidates? One can debate that perpetually. At a minimal, although, it’s clear from plenty of my latest experiences that the CRA’s coaching for its new staff must be improved with higher outcomes.

General, although, it’s lengthy overdue to query why the CRA’s headcount is rising whereas its “shopper expertise” is lower than interesting. Our earnings tax statutes are definitely rising in complexity, so correct administration calls for a extremely educated/skilled workforce to make sure good, however focused compliance.

It might even be good to see the numerous funding will increase afforded to the CRA lately partially re-directed to the Tax Court docket of Canada, which is in dire want of know-how and different enhancements in order to assist it deal with its workload.

Article content material

I’ve sat within the viewers at plenty of tax conferences lately the place representatives from the Tax Court docket have publicly pleaded with the federal authorities to extend their sources with a view to assist with the administration of justice in a extra well timed and environment friendly method.

I respect that’s typically simpler stated than completed, nevertheless it does on its face look like an honest different to easily throwing extra money on the CRA so it could proceed to rent extra staff.

Kim Moody, FCPA, FCA, TEP, is the founding father of Moodys Tax/Moodys Non-public Shopper, a former chair of the Canadian Tax Basis, former chair of the Society of Property Practitioners (Canada) and has held many different management positions within the Canadian tax group. He might be reached at kgcm@kimgcmoody.com and his LinkedIn profile is www.linkedin.com/in/kimmoody.

When you preferred this story, join extra within the FP Investor e-newsletter.

Bookmark our web site and help our journalism: Don’t miss the enterprise information you might want to know — add financialpost.com to your bookmarks and join our newsletters here.

Article content material