Silly tax penalties, legislation won’t fix Canada’s housing crisis

Article content material

Whether or not you’re a federal, provincial or municipal authorities, utilizing the tax system is all the fad to attempt to remedy Canada’s housing supply shortage, which has resulted in no scarcity of foolish taxation measures and laws over the previous few years.

For instance, laws has been applied to prohibit non-Canadians from purchasing Canadian real estate. Whereas there are some exceptions, it grew to become efficient Jan. 1, 2023, and was scheduled to robotically expire on Jan. 1, 2025. Nonetheless, a current announcement by the federal authorities has indicated the intention to amend this laws to extend the ban for another two years in order that it expires on Dec. 31, 2026.

Article content material

Article content material

If foreigners buying Canadian actual property are a major wrongdoer, it’s information to me since no compelling proof has been supplied to assist this laws. It’s additionally a bit stunning that the USA has not retaliated since there are a lot of Canadians who buy actual property within the U.S. and, conversely, there are a lot of People who buy trip properties or spend money on actual property in Canada.

May that retaliation be coming?

The Underused Housing Tax Act, can also be aimed toward foreigners and imposes an annual one per cent tax on the truthful market worth of Canadian residential actual property owned by non-Canadians that isn’t sufficiently occupied throughout a 12 months.

Implementing this measure has been a debacle, with many reportings required, even for Canadians, to be able to declare applicable exemptions from the tax. Bulletins within the 2023 fall financial assertion seem to provide significant relief from such filings, however laws to implement such measures has not but been finished.

Once more, if foreigners are the numerous wrongdoer to Canada’s housing issues, it’s information to me. This laws and the associated administration have to be instantly scrapped.

Article content material

Article content material

Then there’s the federal “flipping tax,” which is aimed toward traders who “flip” residential property. First proposed within the 2021 Liberal Get together election coverage platform, this duplicative tax measure (for the reason that Canada Income Company already had loads of ammunition to totally tax flippers’ earnings, together with correct disclosures on tax returns to assist establish and audit flippers) was launched into the Earnings Tax Act final 12 months to totally tax earnings — versus extra preferential capital positive factors charges — of those that eliminate residential properties inside one 12 months of acquisition. There are particular “life occasion” exceptions to this rule.

Final week, British Columbia decided to join the party and launched provisions in its price range paperwork to basically replicate the federal rule, however broaden the timing utility to 2 years (with such tax scaling right down to ultimately zero between one 12 months and two years) from the acquisition date versus the federal one-year rule.

These duplicative guidelines add pointless complexity and traps for a lot of Canadians and have to be repealed.

Article content material

If flippers are materially contributing to Canada’s housing challenges, it’s information to me.

Probably the most egregious taxation coverage measures applied throughout my lifetime was the introduction of a tax on the gross proceeds of short-term rental property homeowners who function in a municipality/jurisdiction that prohibits short-term leases efficient Jan. 1, 2024. (As an apart, British Columbia has additionally launched vital new rules regarding short-term rentals).

Why so egregious? Effectively, this new measure prohibits the deduction of normal business expenses in opposition to the gross leases obtained and so the relevant taxation charge is now on gross income. This might lead to conditions the place short-term rental homeowners — who are sometimes attempting to easily eke out a residing or get a return on their properties regardless of prohibitions on working of their municipality — are worse off than, say, a drug dealer who is tax compliant (since such legal receipts are certainly taxable and there’s no specific prohibition on the deduction of their “enterprise” bills). This can be a very harmful precedent.

Article content material

Once more, if short-term property homeowners are considerably contributing to Canada’s housing issues, it’s information to me. This foolish provision must be repealed.

The implementation of varied municipal “empty dwelling taxes” reminiscent of these in existence in Vancouver, Toronto and different areas is one other foolish one. These municipal taxes add vital complexity and dangers for property owners who inadvertently don’t adjust to required submitting necessities. Such taxes are dubious at best when attempting to unravel varied housing challenges and needs to be repealed.

Mark my phrases: all of the above taxation measures could have zero (or, to be truthful, maybe negligible) affect on growing Canada’s housing provide. Each one of many above measures needs to be repealed.

However as ordinary, good politics — and taking part in the blame sport by attacking bogeymen — is at all times higher than good coverage.

Canada’s taxation system is complicated. We don’t want so as to add to that complexity with duplicative, pointless and harmful taxation provisions to attempt to remedy our housing challenges.

Kim Moody, FCPA, FCA, TEP, is the founding father of Moodys Tax/Moodys Non-public Consumer, a former chair of the Canadian Tax Basis, former chair of the Society of Property Practitioners (Canada) and has held many different management positions within the Canadian tax neighborhood. He may be reached at kgcm@kimgcmoody.com and his LinkedIn profile is www.linkedin.com/in/kimmoody.

When you favored this story, join extra within the FP Investor publication.

Article content material